The Countrey is strangely incommodated with
flies, which the English call Musketaes, they are like our gnats, they will
sting so fiercely in summer as to make the faces of the English swell’d and scabby,
as if the small pox for the first year.
Likewise there is a small black fly no bigger than a flea, so numerous
up in the Countrey, that a man cannot draw his breath, but he will suck of them
in: they continue about thirty days say some, but I say three moneths, and are
not only a pesterment but a plague to the countrey. -- John Josselyn, Two Voyages to New-England
(1674). [Josselyn spent several years
on his brother’s farm in
Question: Why are the best canoe tripping rivers in Maine almost deserted
during the good weather and water flow conditions in early June?
Answer:
The blackfly, a biting insect of genus Simulium.
Question: What is Kimball’s Plane?
Answer:
A mental, possibly spiritual, state of interaction with black flies in
which the black flies don’t bother the human subject.
Question: Are you serious?
Answer:
Read on…….
I swear this is a true account of
pesterment.
There’s a moment of awareness, sometimes,
when an event occurs that leads you to discover that you’ve passed some sort of
boundary. Or perhaps an event doesn’t
occur, as when the dog didn’t bark in the Sherlock Holmes story, and you notice
it only in retrospect. Just as deja
vu is the sensation that one has been in a similar place or situation
before, the feeling I’m trying to describe is the sensation that one hasn’t been
in a similar situation before, that something about the situation is new. Something that isn’t obvious to you.
Say you’ve spent a long time learning to
ski. One day you realize, after
absent-mindedly making it through a difficult section, that you’ve achieved a
level of competence you hadn’t known before, and this new awareness makes
everything a little different -- makes you a little different -- from then
on. Before, you had to think about
technique – you planned how to cut a turn -- but now it’s become part of you, and you simply do it by imagining
it.
Sometimes you find yourself aware of a
change that has gradually happened.
Once during a casual conversation at a campsite an Allagash ranger said
to four of us old friends -- he was describing his colleague – “he’s about my
age.” That was all, just an offhand
remark. After a few minutes it dawned
on us that he meant “in contrast to your advanced age.” We knew only then that we four had become
old, had passed into forty-something maturity in the eyes of the twentyish
ranger. Our realization of this passage
in our lives could not have been more dramatic if the ranger had waved a magic
wand to suddenly give us gray hair and crow’s feet. To suddenly discover something new about oneself can be a startling
experience. Sometimes it’s unsettling,
sometimes uplifting.
Here’s the the true account of
pesterment, blackflies in particular:
one subsequent June there were again four of us on the Allagash, each
with a canoe and a fishing rig. Every
day the sun beat down from clear blue skies;
good food and dry firewood were abundant; our pace was leisurely.
We all agreed it was as close to an ideal vacation as could be
imagined. We wore the familiar Allagash
like our favorite flannel shirt. We
even located a legendary secret fishing spot that had eluded us for years.
At our unhurried pace other parties would
pass by as we stopped to make camp and to fish. One party was a business-like group of men who appeared
experienced and well-equipped. They
passed us at
When we arrived at Michaud Farm ranger
station, we asked about the availability of campsites downstream. During this conversation we learned that the
party who had passed us had quit their river trip. “They couldn’t stand the black flies,” the ranger explained.
“Black flies?” we asked. “What black flies?”
Aha!
A moment of awareness crept up on us!
We knew then that we had passed a boundary, a boundary of bug
tolerance. We had not merely endured,
we had not even noticed a plague of black flies that had driven others away.
Canoeing adventurers divide “bugs” into
three categories of man-eating insects.
These are mosquitoes, black flies, and no-see-ums. Each has its modus operandi.
Night and day, as long as it’s warm
enough, mosquitoes will be homing in on warm-blooded creatures. Their needle-like mouths can probe through
almost any layer of fabric, even a tight weave of canvas or denim. However, mosquitoes provide their human
victims with a sporting chance. They
announce their presence with an audible whine.
They can be felt, just barely, when they land on skin, and they can be
felt, some seconds later, when they break the skin, giving the victim a chance
to react. Besides, it’s rare when
mosquitoes occur in packs dense enough to cast a shadow.
No-see-ums live around warm, moist,
grassy areas and come out only at nightfall and go away again when the sun
comes up. Their individual bites are
insignificant, but their aggregate effect is an exquisite itch over all the
victim’s exposed skin. Fortunately,
this irritation seldom lingers when the no-see-ums are gone.
Black flies are more numerous and
barbaric. Compared to the surgical
precision of the mosquito’s bite, the black fly’s bite is a bloody
serration. They travel in regiments,
crawling under cuffs, collars, and button plackets. They are often so numerous that a person’s sense of touch can’t
detect them individually on his skin.
By the time the victim feels them, they’ve already drawn blood and left
a welt. They fly into ears and eyes,
find their way through hair and under hatbands. They seem to have no fear of being crushed. The only good part is that black flies go
away at night, and don’t bite while inside of tents. Hands down, black flies are the pre-eminent airborne vermin of
the
We will not pretend that bugs never
bother even those who have passed the boundary of bug tolerance. If you’ve never spent whole days among them,
without the luxury of going indoors for a rest, you’ll just have to use your
imagination to understand why some campers give up and go home as fast as possible. We have been plagued mightily over the years
and we’ve used a whole bag of tricks to avoid them.
An obvious line of defense against bugs
is clothing, covering as much skin as possible. Since mosquitoes can penetrate through a single tight weave, there
must be two fairly fine layers of cloth to protect against them, evidently
because their probosci are not flexible enough bend around and through the
second layer. Black flies are stopped
even by a single layer of any moderate weave but they readily crawl around
openings. Tight cuffs, waistbands, and
hatbands are helpful. No-see-ums are
also stopped by a single fine weave (We vividly recall that older-style
mosquito netting didn’t work!) and tight openings. For defensive clothing, then, the best all-around outfit is tight
enough to stop blackflies and no-see-ums at cuffs and collar, and dense enough
to keep mosquitoes from drilling through.
Knowledge of the adversary’s habitat is a
big help, too. Open spaces have fewer
bugs than sheltered, shaded areas. Bugs
have a harder time staying aloft in breezier areas. Dry areas produce fewer mosquitoes than wet areas. Black flies hatch from cool running
water. Adding all these together, a
general rule is that a higher, drier, and wider resort is less buggy. The ability to pick a good situation is
helpful.
Both heat and smoke repel bugs. A campfire, even on a warm day, will provide
the temporary relief of a bug-free zone.
A smudge is a fire made smoky with green leaves or grass added to the
fuel; bugs avoid flying into
smoke. A smudge pot is a portable
smudge, a metal bucket or large can containing hot coals and green stuff.. A smudge pot can be placed upwind, or under
a table, so that the smoke drifts among the beleaguered humans. Smudges can provide a little zone of sanity
at the campsite.
We’ve never found head-nets to be
effective -- they’re more distracting than just the bugs. The black flies who
specialize in mining and sapping inevitably get inside head nets and then one
must try to crush the invaders without letting even more inside the
headnet. Still, some folks like
head-nets. We can’t argue with that.
There are various insect repelling
substances, ranging from home-made to high-tech. American Indians used to rub down with fish oil when the bugs
were thick. We haven’t tried this one,
but it probably works, since bugs don’t like to land on oily or sticky
surfaces. We suspect that this quality
partly explains the effectiveness of Avon Skin-So-Soft, a skin lotion not
developed or sold as bug juice, but nonetheless a reputable dope. There are aromatic washes, typified by the
kind formerly sold as Old Woodsman, containing various proportions of camphor,
pine tar, and pennyroyal. We think this
combination smells nicer than Old Spice, and it invariably reminds us of old
times and happy fishing. We’re not
convinced of its effectiveness, however.
There is also a theory that the color of
one’s clothing can affect the attention of black flies. We have never noticed any difference.
There is the organic compound DEET (diethyltoluamide, if we remember right) which removes varnish from paddles and fishing rods, causes skin irritation after a few hours, and probably causes cancer in black flies. We hate to use it, but since it seems to work we sprinkle it into our neckerchief when things are tough. Fortunately, things haven’t been tough for several years.
The fact is, however, that there is no
truly effective means of avoiding contact with dense clouds of the crawling,
biting pests if one is to sojourn in the woods during prime trout season. They will be there by the thousands, flying
into your eyes, flying into your ears, biting you in several places as soon as
your hands are occupied. They will be
there. There is nothing one do can about
the omnipresence of black flies.
Still, lots of old-timers survived
black-fly season. How?
Dealing effectively with black flies is a
matter of attitude. In fact, it would
be more accurate to say that living comfortably among black flies is a matter
of not dealing with them. The proper
technique is no technique.
A few years ago we were introduced to an
old fellow named Arthur Kimball who lived in a cabin beside a cool stream in
the
Up to this point in our education, our
approach had been to study just the black flies, assuming that the way to avoid
being bitten was to find some substance or technique to do something to
them. Intrigued by Kimball’s example,
we set out to study not only the black flies, but our reactions to them.
What was the nature of the communication
between man and pest? Our first
hypothesis was that Kimball wasn’t bothered (and bitten) because something in
his attitude or posture neutralized their predatory inclinations. Or perhaps other people get bothered and
bitten because they somehow alert the black flies to their availability as
prey. In either case, let’s call this
the Attitude Hypothesis, which is ABlack
flies bite humans only when the humans behave in a certain way in the presence
of black flies.@ Was the unscathed Kimball doing something,
or was he doing nothing? What was it
that he did (or didn’t) that was different from what the itching, suffering we
didn’t (or did)? If we could identify
this behavior we could confirm the Attitude Hypothesis as an explanation of
Kimball’s Plane.
A second hypothesis, not mutually
exclusive with the first, was that the communication from human to black fly
was transmitted through skin chemistry.
We’ll call this the Immune-Response Hypothesis, and state it as Prolonged exposure to the bites of black
flies elicits an immune response in some humans which tends to inhibit the
biting of black flies, or perhaps minimize the effect of the bites. Although it was possible that Kimball’s
attitude alone had altered his skin chemistry so as to produce a natural bug
dope, we thought it far more probable that, if such an immunity existed, it was
the result of many bites over a long period of time, an acquired
immune-response.
And so, in the interest of science, we
began to test these theories. For our
first experiment, during a moment of leisure on the
There were hundreds of them. They landed and crawled on our face and neck
and hands, into our hair and ears -- you get the picture. Calmly as we could manage, we imagined that
we were Kimball relaxing by his front door on a spring day.
Having more-or-less achieved a state of
serenity (as close as anyone could get while crawled on by dozens of little
flies), the first thing we observed was that very few of the black flies we
could feel crawling around on our skin stayed long enough to bite. They’d land, take off, fly around, land
again, and so on. Sure, some of them
bit, but not nearly as many as we might have expected. It really wasn’t so bad! After a half-hour, we received perhaps a
half-dozen bites after observing hundreds of black fly landings. We concluded that in our previous agitations
we had wasted a lot of effort slapping at flies that wouldn’t have bitten us
anyway.
The next thing we observed, as we
maintained our cool for an extended period, was that the incidence of black fly
landings diminished, although we could still see them flying around us. When we resumed moving our arms, they came
closer and landed again. After further
observation we concluded the bugs’ attraction to the human was related to the
rapidity and range of the human’s movements.
Since our cool attitude seemed to have been effective, we concluded that the Attitude Hypothesis merited further study. It seemed that an effective response to black flies would include minimizing movement, particularly by not reacting to the feeling of the black flies landing on one’s skin. To this end, we would not slap at any bugs we felt on our skin, but would economically rub out any fly we felt biting us.
Our next experiment was conducted by
observing others – that is, other people and other black flies.
At an
It was apparent that the subjects most
disturbed by the black flies were the persons who were most agitated. Those subjects whose movements were
economical and task-related expressed the fewest comments and displayed the
fewest slapping and waving behaviors. Those who waved their arms around and
slapped frequently expressed more (and more vehement) comments concerning their
perceived vexations. We acknowledge the
circularity of the proposition that calmer people appear to be less agitated. Even so, we concluded that as far as we
cared the Attitude Hypothesis had been verified. That it provides a practical approach is the main thing. Since black flies are attracted to the sorts
of movements that frenzied people exhibit, it is evident that the subjective
experience of being vexed by black flies becomes a vicious cycle in which the
subject’s response induces an escalation in the black flies’ activity.
Believing we had hit upon a useful method of minimizing the bother of black flies, we accustomed ourself to remaining calm in their presence. We didn’t wave our arms or slap at them, secure in the faith that if we didn’t get the heebie-jeebies we’d end up with just a few acceptable bites. After a while this deliberate approach became second nature and we didn’t think much about it.
We never devised a way to test the Immune-Response Hypothesis. Truth is, we almost forgot about it as the years went by. When we ventured into the woods the black flies never seemed to be as bad as we might have expected. Since we never used it, we stopped bringing along a bottle of bug dope. We dressed defensively, of course, and we fired up a smudge pot once in a while, but mostly the presence of black flies became part of the background.
Then one day the Allagash ranger told us
that the black flies we hadn’t noticed had driven others away. Suddenly we saw that gradually we had
changed. We had arrived at Kimball’s
Plane.
Remain calm. Keep practicing.
Copyright 2004 by Mike Everett, all
rights reserved